In an attempt to identify the most important sites in Kent for amphibians and reptiles, KRAG has created a Key Site Register. Full details of the register and the criteria used to identify sites can be found on the KRAG website.
Key Amphibian Sites
Metadata associated with each site can be viewed by clicking the respective icon. We are working on creating individual site plans (to illustrate site boundaries, ponds, hibernacula etc).
If a site plan is available a map icon that looks like the image above will appear in the metadata bubble. If no site plan is yet available, the map icon will be replaced by the KRAG Best Practice Logo.
View Larger Map
Criteria for Amphibians:
Defining Key Amphibian Sites usually concerns breeding ponds. However, the criteria must take into consideration important terrestrial habitat. KRAG has therefore developed the following system that borrows heavily from the SSSI scores described by Trevor Beebee and Robin Grayson in the Herpetofauna Workers Manual (apparently now out of print, but may be republished)
(1) All sites with natterjack toad.
(2) All sites with an exceptional (or large) population or metapopulation of great crested newt.
(3) All sites with a good or exceptional population of common toad.
(4) Sites with amphibian assemblages that score 5 or more on the SSSI scoring system described by Beebee and Grayson (1998). Greater emphasis to be placed on sites with the highest scores.
(5) The boundary of a Key Amphibian Site may be defined as an area of land within a specified ownership that may include a single waterbody or a collection of waterbodies that supports a metapopulation of one or more species.
(6) The boundary of a Key Amphibian Site may be defined as an area of land within a specified ownership that does not include a waterbody, but does include terrestrial habitat that is considered important for one or more species (particularly for common toad).
(7) The boundary of a Key Amphibian Site may be defined as land within a specified Survey Region that may be owned and/or managed by one or more landowners. The site may include a single waterbody, a collection of waterbodies that support a metapopulation of one or more species and/or terrestrial habitat that is considered important for one or more species.
(8) The boundary of the Key Amphibian Site should include all areas of suitable terrestrial habitat that are located within 250 m of each waterbody that is occupied by the species (or species assemblage) of interest. Such terrestrial habitat is considered critical to the functioning of a metapopulation.
(9) Where a waterbody that is occupied by the species (or species assemblage) of interest is located outside of a Key Amphibian Site boundary, but situated within 500 m of another occupied waterbody that is already located within a Key Amphibian Site boundary, both waterbodies and their associated terrestrial habitat should be considered for inclusion within the Key Amphibian Site boundary.
(10) Key Amphibian Sites should relate to waterbodies and terrestrial habitat that is located on the proximal side of significant dispersal barriers.
Key Reptile Sites
In November 1999 Froglife published the excellent Reptile Survey Advice Sheet that deals with how to conduct reptile surveys and interpret their results. There hasn't been anything published since that has offered a better review. One of the outstanding achievements of the Froglife Reptile Survey advice sheet was in devising a simple, but meaningful tool by which reptile sites could be formally assessed. Such survey assessments led to the promotion of Key Reptile Sites.
The Key Reptile Site Register is a mechanism designed to promote the safeguard of important reptile sites.
View Larger Map
Criteria for Reptiles:
KRAG have adopted and slightly amended the Froglife methodology to create criteria used to identify key reptile sites.
(1) All sites with sand lizard.
(2) The site supports three or more reptile species.
(3) The site supports two snake species.
(4) The site supports an exceptional population of one species.
(5) The site supports an assemblage of species scoring at least four, based on the relative population scoring system described by Froglife (1999).
(6) The site is of particular regional importance due to local rarity. In Kent, such sites will include (but not be exclusive to) any areas that support a ‘good’ or ‘exceptional’ population of adder, based on the population scoring system described by Froglife (1999).
(7) The boundary of a Key Reptile Site may be defined as an area of land within a specified ownership.
(8) The boundary of a Key Reptile Site may be defined as land within a specified Survey Region that may be owned and/or managed by one or more landowners.
(9) Greater emphasis will be placed on promoting designated sites where available data indicates the presence of a breeding population. Breeding will be determined by the identification of eggs, neonates and/or juveniles.
(10) Greater emphasis will be placed on promoting designated sites that include terrestrial habitat features that are deemed of particular importance to reptiles. Such features may include hibernation areas, nesting sites and foraging areas.
[and just in case you haven't guessed yet, the two maps are dynamic and will always show the most up to date information]